Home/Texas Supreme Court/Carroll v. Silk

Carroll v. Silk

11 S.W. 116, 70 Tex. 23, 1888 Tex. LEXIS 936
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 10, 1888
DocketNo. 2504
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 11 S.W. 116 (Carroll v. Silk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. Silk, 11 S.W. 116, 70 Tex. 23, 1888 Tex. LEXIS 936 (Tex. 1888).

Opinion

Gaines, Associate Justice.

The defendant in error brought this suit in the court below to recover of plaintiffs in error’s intestate the precise sum of five hundred dollars, exclusive of interest. It is held that the district court has no jurisdiction of a suit for this amount. (Rambolt v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, 67 Texas, 654.) The judgment for the defendant in error must therefore be reversed and the suit dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. First National Life Insurance Co.
408 S.W.2d 524 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1966)
Scott v. Hackfeld
263 S.W.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1953)
Dillion v. Dillion
274 S.W. 217 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Kolb v. Gerson
215 S.W. 987 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)
Escue v. Hartley
202 S.W. 159 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)
Humphrey v. Coquillard Wagon Works
1913 OK 441 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Waller v. Gray
94 S.W. 1098 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1906)
Creswell Ranch & Cattle Co. v. Scoggins
39 S.W. 612 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1897)
St. Louis Type Foundry v. Taylor
26 S.W. 226 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 S.W. 116, 70 Tex. 23, 1888 Tex. LEXIS 936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-silk-tex-1888.