Carroll v. Scott

12 A.D.3d 670, 785 N.Y.S.2d 495, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14488
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 2004·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding to enforce a money judgment, Ron Scott appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson-Thomas, J.), dated August 26, 2003, as denied his objection to an order of the same [671]*671court (Contaratos, H.E.), dated May 12, 2003, which directed him to pay the sum of $3,000 per month for, among other things, spousal and child support arrears.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the objection is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The Family Court was without jurisdiction to hear the petition to enforce a money judgment derived from a 1995 judgment of divorce issued under an earlier index number where there was no ongoing support proceeding and no order granting maintenance or support before it (see CPLR 5221; Family Ct Act § 466 [c]). Accordingly, the proceeding should have been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Smith, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. Scott, 12 A.D.3d 670, 785 N.Y.S.2d 495, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14488 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

12 A.D.3d 670 (Carroll v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Layne G.G. v. Kevin P.D.
2005 NY Slip Op 25233 (Ulster Family Court, 2005)
Layne G.G. v. Kevin P.D.
8 Misc. 3d 857 (NYC Family Court, 2005)