Carroll v. Rountree
248 S.E.2d 725, 295 N.C. 549, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1027
This text of 248 S.E.2d 725 (Carroll v. Rountree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carroll v. Rountree, 248 S.E.2d 725, 295 N.C. 549, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1027 (N.C. 1978).
Opinion
William F. CARROLL
v.
H. Horton ROUNTREE.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nye, Mitchell & Bugg, for plaintiff.
*726 Teague, Johnson, Patterson, Dilthey & Clay, for defendant.
Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31, 36 N.C.App. 156, 243 S.E.2d 821. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carroll v. Rountree
243 S.E.2d 821 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
248 S.E.2d 725, 295 N.C. 549, 1978 N.C. LEXIS 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-rountree-nc-1978.