Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad
2 Pennyp. 159
This text of 2 Pennyp. 159 (Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 2 Pennyp. 159 (Pa. 1882).
Opinion
The injury received by the plaintiff was attributable solely to his own gross carelessness. It is in vain for a man to say that he looked and listened, if, in despite of what his eyes and ears must have told him, he walked directly in front of a moving locomotive.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Klutt v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.
133 F. 1003 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1904)
Groner v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
153 Pa. 390 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Blight v. Camden etc. R.
21 A. 995 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Pennyp. 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-pennsylvania-railroad-pa-1882.