Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad
2 Pennyp. 159
Opinion
The injury received by the plaintiff was attributable solely to his own gross carelessness. It is in vain for a man to say that he looked and listened, if, in despite of what his eyes and ears must have told him, he walked directly in front of a moving locomotive.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 2 Pennyp. 159 (Pa. 1882).
2 Pennyp. 159 (Carroll v. Pennsylvania Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Klutt v. Philadelphia & R. Ry. Co.
133 F. 1003 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1904)
Groner v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.
153 Pa. 390 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Blight v. Camden etc. R.
21 A. 995 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)