Carroll v. Pagoulatos Bros.

93 So. 259, 18 Ala. App. 537, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 202
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 30, 1922
Docket6 Div. 31.
StatusPublished

This text of 93 So. 259 (Carroll v. Pagoulatos Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. Pagoulatos Bros., 93 So. 259, 18 Ala. App. 537, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 202 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

Petition is filed by Nannie Carroll and Reams Underhill, pro ami, praying a writ of mandamus to issue to compel J. Q. Smith, as Judge of the Tenth Judicial Circuit, to annul and set aside two orders or decrees, entered in the case of Nannie Carroll, Plaintiff, v. Pagoulatos Bros., No.18428, and Reams Underhill, pro ami, v. Pagoulatos Bros., No. 18429, in the circuit court of Jefferson county, wherein judgments by default in favor of the two plaintiffs and against the defendants had, upon motion of defendants, under section 5372 of the Code of 1907, been set aside. The petition presents distinct rights of different persons, which cannot be joined in the same petition, and for that reason the petition must be dismissed. Goodwyn, Judge, v. Sherer, 145 Ala. 501, 40 South. 279; Banks v. Mobley, 4 Ala. App. 510, 58 South. 745.

The respondents’ motion is granted, and the petition is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Banks v. Mobley
58 So. 745 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Goodwyn v. Sherer
40 So. 279 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 So. 259, 18 Ala. App. 537, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-pagoulatos-bros-alactapp-1922.