Carroll v. North Florida Sweeping/Sunshine Companies/Unisource Administration, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carroll v. North Florida Sweeping/Sunshine Companies/Unisource Administration, Inc.

868 So. 2d 669, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3944, 2004 WL 609291

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 30, 2004

DocketNo. 1D02-4414

StatusPublished

This text of 868 So. 2d 669 (Carroll v. North Florida Sweeping/Sunshine Companies/Unisource Administration, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. North Florida Sweeping/Sunshine Companies/Unisource Administration, Inc., 868 So. 2d 669, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3944, 2004 WL 609291 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

Claimant, Donald Carroll, challenges a final order denying him workers’ compensation benefits based on the statute of limitations. Finding no competent substantial evidence on the record before us to support the judge of compensation claims’ determination concerning claimant’s knowledge that his physician was deauthorized after the carrier’s payment for visits to his physician in 1998, we reverse the determination that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and remand for further proceedings.

PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, C.J.

Claimant, Donald Carroll, challenges a final order denying him workers’ compensation benefits based on the statute of limitations. Finding no competent substantial evidence on the record before us to support the judge of compensation claims’ determination concerning claimant’s knowledge that his physician was deauthorized after the carrier’s payment for visits to his physician in 1998, we reverse the determination that the claim was barred by the statute of limitations and remand for further proceedings.

PADOVANO and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 So. 2d 669, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 3944, 2004 WL 609291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-north-florida-sweepingsunshine-companiesunisource-fladistctapp-2004.