Carroll v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

749 N.E.2d 293, 92 Ohio St. 3d 215
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 2001·No. No. 01-83·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Littrell v. Wigglesworth (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 425, 746 N.E.2d 1077, and Clark v. Scarpelli (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 271, 744 N.E.2d 719.

The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with our decisions in Littrell and Clark.

Scanlon & Gearinger Co., L.P.A., Robert A. Royer and Joy D. Malek, for appellant. Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley L.L.P., Timothy D. Johnson, Gregory E. O’Brien and Shawn W. Maestle, for appellee. Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, 749 N.E.2d 293, 92 Ohio St. 3d 215 (Ohio 2001).

749 N.E.2d 293 (Carroll v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carroll v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
2001 Ohio 176 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2001)