Carroll v. Miami-Dade County

1 So. 3d 269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 75, 2009 WL 36562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 2009
Docket1D08-5797
StatusPublished

This text of 1 So. 3d 269 (Carroll v. Miami-Dade County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. Miami-Dade County, 1 So. 3d 269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 75, 2009 WL 36562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because Petitioner has not shown a departure from the essential requirements of law resulting in material injury which cannot be remedied on appeal from a final order, the petition for writ of certiorari is DENIED. See e.g., Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Fla., Inc., 889 So.2d 812, 822 (Fla.2004).

BARFIELD, KAHN, VAN NORTWICK, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reeves v. Fleetwood Homes of Florida, Inc.
889 So. 2d 812 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 So. 3d 269, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 75, 2009 WL 36562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-miami-dade-county-fladistctapp-2009.