Carroll v. McKenzie

246 A.D. 706

Opinion

Order denying petitioner’s motion for a peremptory order of mandamus reinstating him to the position of dockmaster in the department of docks unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carroll v. McKenzie, 246 A.D. 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 706 (Carroll v. McKenzie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.