Carroll v. McAllister
This text of Carroll v. McAllister (Carroll v. McAllister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
TIMOTHY WILEY,
Plaintiff, 8:20CV265
vs. ORDER ROSETTA MCALLISTER, RN;
Defendant.
Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking appointment of counsel. However, [i]ndigent civil litigants do not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel. The trial court has broad discretion to decide whether both the plaintiff and the court will benefit from the appointment of counsel[.]” Davis v. Scott, 94 F.3d 444, 447 (8th Cir. 1996). No such benefit is apparent here at this time. Accordingly, the request for the appointment of counsel (Filing No. 25) is denied without prejudice to reassertion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 8th day of January, 2021.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Susan M. Bazis United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carroll v. McAllister, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-mcallister-ned-2021.