Carroll v. Locke

58 N.H. 163
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedAugust 5, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 58 N.H. 163 (Carroll v. Locke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. Locke, 58 N.H. 163 (N.H. 1877).

Opinion

Foster, J.

. Civil actions in the supreme court, in which an issue has been joined and judgment rendered, except in cases otherwise provided, and such actions in which judgment has been rendered by agreement of parties open to review, may be once reviewed.” Gen. St., c. 215, s. 1.

After issue joined, this cause was referred by consent. The right of trial by jury, and the right of review, were waived by the terms of the agreement providing that the report should be final and that judgment should be entered thereon, as of the term at which the cause was referred. There is no suggestion of any accident or mistake.

Statutory provisions, which are enacted for the benefit of individuals and not on account of mere public considerations, may be waived by those for whose benefit they are intended. Hanover v. Weare, 2 N. H. 131; Page v. Pendergast, ib. 235; Lisbon v. Bath, 23 N. H. 9; Brown v. Dudley, 33 N. H. 511; Plummer v. Meserve, 54 N. H. 166; Perkins v. Scott, 57 N. H. 55 ; Bouv. Dic., Waiver.

Exceptions sustained.

Stanley, J., did not sit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodge v. Stickney
61 N.H. 607 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1882)
Parsons v. Hilliard
61 N.H. 642 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.H. 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-locke-nh-1877.