Carroll v. Hodas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carroll v. Hodas

71 A.D.2d 936, 419 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 71 A.D.2d 936 (Carroll v. Hodas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. Hodas, 71 A.D.2d 936, 419 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating re[937]*937spondent Virginia D. Daley as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 11, 1979 for the public office of member of the Town Board, Town of Poughkeepsie, 2d Ward, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 20, 1979, which, after a hearing, (1) dismissed the proceeding and (2) directed the Commissioners of Election to place the name of Virginia D. Daley on the ballot. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It should be noted that the absence of a transcript makes it extremely difficult for this court to determine whether petitioners have met their burden of proof. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Shapiro and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding, inter alia, to invalidate petitions designating re[937]*937spondent Virginia D. Daley as a candidate in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 11, 1979 for the public office of member of the Town Board, Town of Poughkeepsie, 2d Ward, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated August 20, 1979, which, after a hearing, (1) dismissed the proceeding and (2) directed the Commissioners of Election to place the name of Virginia D. Daley on the ballot. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. It should be noted that the absence of a transcript makes it extremely difficult for this court to determine whether petitioners have met their burden of proof. Mollen, P. J., O’Connor, Shapiro and Gibbons, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.2d 936, 419 N.Y.S.2d 884, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-hodas-nyappdiv-1979.