Carroll v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
This text of 258 A.D. 937 (Carroll v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The evidence does not show that the basket over which plaintiff tripped was placed in the aisle by an employee of defendant. The basket was not in the aisle long enough to charge the defendant with notice thereof. The aisles in defendant’s store were not so narrow as to be dangerous upon use by customers and plaintiff’s fall was not caused by the narrowness of such aisles. It was not shown that defendant was negligent. (Greene v. Sibley, Lindsay & Curr Co., 257 N. Y. 190.) All concur. (The judgment dismisses the complaint in a negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 937, 16 N.Y.S.2d 608, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1939.