Carroll v. Cohen
This text of 262 A.D. 481 (Carroll v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitions herein were sufficient. They contained a statement that the signers were duly qualified voters who had registered to vote in the borough of Manhattan, city of New York, within eighteen months previous to the filing of the petition. In this respect the petitions differed from those considered in Matter of Goldberg v. Cohen (257 App. Div. 675; affd., 281 N. Y. 776). As we indicated in the case cited, there is no express requirement in the statute that the address of registration be given.
The order appealed from should be reversed and the motion denied.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 481, 30 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1941.