Carroll v. Carroll
108 S.E.2d 278, 214 Ga. 827, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 359
Opinion
The evidence in the present case does not show such wilful disobedience of the court’s decree as would require that the defendant be held in contempt for failure to pay alimony. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in holding that he was not in contempt of court. Yancey v. Mills, 210 Ga. 684 (82 S. E. 2d 505).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carroll v. Carroll, 108 S.E.2d 278, 214 Ga. 827, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 359 (Ga. 1959).
108 S.E.2d 278 (Carroll v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biggers v. Biggers
149 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)