Carroll v. Burns & Garrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Carroll v. Burns & Garrison

134 S.E. 177, 35 Ga. App. 587, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1013

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 14, 1926

Docket17360

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 177 (Carroll v. Burns & Garrison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. Burns & Garrison, 134 S.E. 177, 35 Ga. App. 587, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1013 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

1. Grounds 4, 5, 8, 9, and 10 of the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of documentary evidence, can not be considered by this court, since the evidence is not set out in the grounds nor attached as exhibits thereto.

2. There is no merit in the remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial. These grounds complain of the direction of a verdict for the [588]*588plaintiffs. The evidence adduced by the plaintiffs, which was all the evidence in the case, demanded the verdict directed; and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Decided July 14, 1926. J. C. & H. E. Edwa/rds, for plaintiffs in error. I. H. Button, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI