Carroll v. AFCO Credit Corp.

238 S.E.2d 264, 143 Ga. App. 264, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2279
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 15, 1977
Docket54269
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 238 S.E.2d 264 (Carroll v. AFCO Credit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carroll v. AFCO Credit Corp., 238 S.E.2d 264, 143 Ga. App. 264, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2279 (Ga. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Appellant was sued by appellee on an open account for $599.07 principal, $41.93 interest and court costs. The instant suit was for balance due on insurance premiums. Appellant filed his answer denying that he owed any amount and attached as an exhibit to his answer a letter from appellant to appellee’s attorney claiming an overpayment.

The case was tried without a jury by the Judge of the State Court of DeKalb County and a judgment was rendered by the court against the appellant for $589.07 plus costs of court.

Appellant appeals and enumerates as error: (1) The trial court erred in failing to rule upon the counterclaim which was contained in appellant’s answer; (2) The trial court erred in its failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Held:

1. Enumeration of error number 1 has no merit. Even under the liberal concept of pleading as set forth in the Georgia Civil Practice Act, the filing of a letter as an exhibit to defensive pleadings cannot be considered as a counterclaim.

2. Enumeration of error number 2 has merit. Since there was a failure to make the requisite findings of fact and conclusions of law, the appeal must be remanded with direction that the trial judge vacate the judgment and that he prepare or cause to be prepared appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law, and enter a new judgment thereon. Thereafter, the losing party shall be free to enter another appeal if he should wish to do so. Bell v. Stocks, 128 Ga. App. 799 (198 SE2d 209).

Judgment remanded with direction.

Deen, P. J., and Webb, J., concur. Submitted September 6, 1977 Decided September 15, 1977. Huddleston & Medori, H. Martin Huddleston, for appellant. Lazarus & Stokes, Wayne H. Lazarus, John C. Heath, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blythe v. Bell
2012 NCBC 42 (North Carolina Business Court, 2012)
Cochran v. Cochran
268 S.E.2d 728 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Guest v. Guest
246 S.E.2d 503 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 S.E.2d 264, 143 Ga. App. 264, 1977 Ga. App. LEXIS 2279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-v-afco-credit-corp-gactapp-1977.