Carroll, Jeremy Austin
This text of Carroll, Jeremy Austin (Carroll, Jeremy Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-91,285-01
EX PARTE JEREMY AUSTIN CARROLL, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 9954 IN THE 411TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TRINITY COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of improper relationship between educator and student and
indecency with a child and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment on each charge. The Sixth
Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Carroll v. State, No. 06-18-00052-CR (Tex, App. —
Texarkana Oct. 31,2018). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county
of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07.
Applicant contends that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to seek suppression of the
digital contents of his cell phone, failing to challenge admission of Applicant’s pre-test admissions
to a polygraph examiner, and failing to challenge the trial court’s bias and arbitrary refusal to 2
consider Applicant’s mitigating evidence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him
to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be
developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing
the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects
to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and
wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the
hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court
shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s
performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make any other
findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: August 19, 2020 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Carroll, Jeremy Austin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-jeremy-austin-texcrimapp-2020.