Carroll Brick Co. v. Gable

Baltimore City Circuit Court

Carroll Brick Co. v. Gable

1 Balt. C. Rep. 261

DecidedJune 10, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 261 (Carroll Brick Co. v. Gable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Baltimore City Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll Brick Co. v. Gable, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 261 (Md. Super. Ct. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

DENNIS, J.

In this case, I am of the opinion:

1st. That the plaintiffs are estopped from claiming a lien upon the reversion.

2d. That they are entitled to claim a lien upon the leasehold, because Stirling must be considered as agent of Gable, and they are not bound by the unrecorded declaration of trust in favor of Mrs. Gable.

I will sign a decree therefore for the sale of the leasehold interest, unless the amount of the lien claim is paid into Court by a day to be fixed by the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DENNIS, J.

In this case, I am of the opinion:

1st. That the plaintiffs are estopped from claiming a lien upon the reversion.

2d. That they are entitled to claim a lien upon the leasehold, because Stirling must be considered as agent of Gable, and they are not bound by the unrecorded declaration of trust in favor of Mrs. Gable.

I will sign a decree therefore for the sale of the leasehold interest, unless the amount of the lien claim is paid into Court by a day to be fixed by the decree.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-brick-co-v-gable-mdcirctctbalt-1892.