Carroll Amusement Co. v. Ætna Ins.

Ninth Circuit

Carroll Amusement Co. v. Ætna Ins.

292 F. 1016, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3049

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedOctober 8, 1923

DocketNo. 3998

StatusPublished

This text of 292 F. 1016 (Carroll Amusement Co. v. Ætna Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll Amusement Co. v. Ætna Ins., 292 F. 1016, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3049 (9th Cir. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in error issued a fire insurance policy in the sum of $5,000 to the plaintiff in error on its baseball grand stand, built upon a lot of leased ground in the city of Los Angeles. A number of the points made and argued by the respective counsel it is unnecessary to eon[1017]*1017sider. or even to state; we being of the opinion that nothing more need be said than that the trial court, based upon evidence amply sufficient to sustain the finding, found as a fact that, prior to the fire which caused the damage for which the plaintiff in error sued, it surrendered the policy to the insurance company for lack of payment of the premium thereon. The judgment is affirmed. «

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant in error issued a fire insurance policy in the sum of $5,000 to the plaintiff in error on its baseball grand stand, built upon a lot of leased ground in the city of Los Angeles. A number of the points made and argued by the respective counsel it is unnecessary to eon[1017]*1017sider. or even to state; we being of the opinion that nothing more need be said than that the trial court, based upon evidence amply sufficient to sustain the finding, found as a fact that, prior to the fire which caused the damage for which the plaintiff in error sued, it surrendered the policy to the insurance company for lack of payment of the premium thereon. The judgment is affirmed. «

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 F. 1016, 1923 U.S. App. LEXIS 3049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carroll-amusement-co-v-tna-ins-ca9-1923.