Carrodine v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carrodine v. State

633 So. 2d 120, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1994 WL 86488

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 21, 1994

DocketNo. 92-4138

StatusPublished

This text of 633 So. 2d 120 (Carrodine v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrodine v. State, 633 So. 2d 120, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1994 WL 86488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asserts that he was improperly convicted of the lesser-included offense of grand theft since the information which charged him with robbery failed to allege the value of the property taken. We agree that the information was inadequate to support a conviction of grand theft, and we reverse and remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment for petit theft. See J.C.B. v. State, 512 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988).

BARFIELD, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant asserts that he was improperly convicted of the lesser-included offense of grand theft since the information which charged him with robbery failed to allege the value of the property taken. We agree that the information was inadequate to support a conviction of grand theft, and we reverse and remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment for petit theft. See J.C.B. v. State, 512 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988).

BARFIELD, WOLF and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

633 So. 2d 120, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1994 WL 86488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrodine-v-state-fladistctapp-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack