Carrodine v. State
633 So. 2d 120, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1994 WL 86488
Opinion
Appellant asserts that he was improperly convicted of the lesser-included offense of grand theft since the information which charged him with robbery failed to allege the value of the property taken. We agree that the information was inadequate to support a conviction of grand theft, and we reverse and remand to the trial court for entry of a judgment for petit theft. See J.C.B. v. State, 512 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), rev. denied, 520 So.2d 586 (Fla.1988).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carrodine v. State, 633 So. 2d 120, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 2643, 1994 WL 86488 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
633 So. 2d 120 (Carrodine v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of J.C.B. v. State
512 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)