Carrion-Viscay v. State
This text of 478 So. 2d 1192 (Carrion-Viscay v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment and sentence from which the defendant appeals are affirmed upon a holding that the prosecutor’s comment in [1193]*1193closing argument was proper in that it referred to evidence as it existed before the jury, White v. State, 377 So.2d 1149 (Fla.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 845, 101 S.Ct. 129, 66 L.Ed.2d 54 (1980); Robles v. State, 210 So.2d 441 (Fla.1968); Garcia v. State, 439 So.2d 328 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Wilson v. State, 305 So.2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and the sentencing court has the discretion to impose two consecutive life terms, each sentence including a twenty-five year minimum mandatory term, for two first-degree murder convictions, State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165, 168 (Fla.1985); Price v. State, 477 So.2d 671 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (on rehearing).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 So. 2d 1192, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2663, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrion-viscay-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.