Carrion v. Faulkner

New York Court of Appeals

Carrion v. Faulkner

50 N.E.3d 922, 27 N.Y.3d 980

DecidedApril 28, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 50 N.E.3d 922 (Carrion v. Faulkner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrion v. Faulkner, 50 N.E.3d 922, 27 N.Y.3d 980 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. On this record, material questions of fact exist and, therefore, summary judgment for defendants was inappropriate.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, and defendants’ motion for summary judgment denied. On this record, material questions of fact exist and, therefore, summary judgment for defendants was inappropriate.

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 N.E.3d 922, 27 N.Y.3d 980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrion-v-faulkner-ny-2016.