Carrion v. Eastern Elevator Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carrion v. Eastern Elevator Co.

31 A.D.2d 966, 300 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 1969

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 966 (Carrion v. Eastern Elevator Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrion v. Eastern Elevator Co., 31 A.D.2d 966, 300 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the (Supreme 'Court, Kings County, dated May 31,1968, which conditionally granted the third-party defendant’s motion to preclude the third-party plaintiff. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding a provision thereto that, if answers to the requested particulars are contained in the bill of particulars served upon appellant by plaintiffs, then appellant may incorporate said bill, or the relevant portions thereof, in his bill; and, if appellant has no personal knowledge respecting the requested particulars, he shall so state under oath. As so modified, order affirmed without costs. Appellant’s time within which to serve the further bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, appellant should be permitted to frame his bill of particulars in accordance with the modification herewith directed. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the (Supreme 'Court, Kings County, dated May 31,1968, which conditionally granted the third-party defendant’s motion to preclude the third-party plaintiff. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding a provision thereto that, if answers to the requested particulars are contained in the bill of particulars served upon appellant by plaintiffs, then appellant may incorporate said bill, or the relevant portions thereof, in his bill; and, if appellant has no personal knowledge respecting the requested particulars, he shall so state under oath. As so modified, order affirmed without costs. Appellant’s time within which to serve the further bill of particulars is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon. In our opinion, appellant should be permitted to frame his bill of particulars in accordance with the modification herewith directed. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.2d 966, 300 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrion-v-eastern-elevator-co-nyappdiv-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack