Carrington v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carrington v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

464 S.W.3d 558, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2015 WL 3879637

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 23, 2015·No. No. ED 102073·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Carrington (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him uneniT ployment benefits. We find the Commission did not ‘err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[559] sion. The decision, of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Carrington (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him uneniT ployment benefits. We find the Commission did not ‘err in denying Claimant unemployment benefits.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our deci[559] sion. The decision, of the Commission is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Carrington v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 464 S.W.3d 558, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2015 WL 3879637 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

464 S.W.3d 558 (Carrington v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.