Carrin v. State

459 So. 2d 430, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2413, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16600
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1984·No. No. AZ-414·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of the denial of his Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion was filed in the lower court during the penden-cy of appellant’s direct appeal; in such circumstances the lower court is without jurisdiction to grant post-conviction relief and such a motion is therefore properly denied. See Hurst v. State, 379 So.2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Should appellant desire to pursue such relief during the pend-ency of a direct appeal a request may be filed in the appellate court to temporarily relinquish jurisdiction for the lower court to consider a Rule 3.850 motion.

The order appealed is affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s ability to present the issues raised in a proper Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion.

SHIVERS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrin v. State, 459 So. 2d 430, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2413, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16600 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

459 So. 2d 430 (Carrin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dickerson v. State
509 So. 2d 1390 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Johnson v. State
463 So. 2d 419 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)