Carrillo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carrillo v. State

865 So. 2d 528, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18734, 2003 WL 22900921

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 10, 2003

DocketNo. 3D03-1287

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 865 So. 2d 528 (Carrillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrillo v. State, 865 So. 2d 528, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18734, 2003 WL 22900921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment as to the degree of crime for which the defendant was convicted. See Copcutt v. State, 477 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(case remanded to correct degree of crime for which defendant was convicted). The final judgment classifies the burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a second degree felony when it should be categorized as a third degree felony. See § 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). This change does not affect the defendant’s current sentence as he was sentenced as a habitual offender.

Affirmed but remanded to the trial court for correction of the final judgment as directed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment as to the degree of crime for which the defendant was convicted. See Copcutt v. State, 477 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(case remanded to correct degree of crime for which defendant was convicted). The final judgment classifies the burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a second degree felony when it should be categorized as a third degree felony. See § 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). This change does not affect the defendant’s current sentence as he was sentenced as a habitual offender.

Affirmed but remanded to the trial court for correction of the final judgment as directed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

865 So. 2d 528, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18734, 2003 WL 22900921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrillo-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack