Carrillo v. State

865 So. 2d 528, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18734, 2003 WL 22900921
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 10, 2003·No. No. 3D03-1287·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the final judgment as to the degree of crime for which the defendant was convicted. See Copcutt v. State, 477 So.2d 70 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)(case remanded to correct degree of crime for which defendant was convicted). The final judgment classifies the burglary of an unoccupied dwelling as a second degree felony when it should be categorized as a third degree felony. See § 810.02(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1995). This change does not affect the defendant’s current sentence as he was sentenced as a habitual offender.

Affirmed but remanded to the trial court for correction of the final judgment as directed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrillo v. State, 865 So. 2d 528, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 18734, 2003 WL 22900921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

865 So. 2d 528 (Carrillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

C.Y. v. State
263 So. 3d 239 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Steward v. Dept. of Children and Families
865 So. 2d 528 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)