Carrillo v. Social Security Administration

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedMarch 12, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-00531
StatusUnknown

This text of Carrillo v. Social Security Administration (Carrillo v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carrillo v. Social Security Administration, (D.N.M. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

CHRISTINE JACITA CARRILLO, Plaintiff, v. No. 1:19-cv-00531-SMV ANDREW SAUL,1 Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

ORDER Defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner), by and through her counsel, has filed an unopposed motion with this Court, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to enter a judgment with an order of reversal with remand of the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the Commissioner’s request for remand of this action for further proceedings, this Court hereby REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision under

1 Andrew Saul is now the Commissioner of Social Security and is automatically substituted as a party pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act states that an action survives regardless of any change in the person occupying the office of Commissioner of Social Security. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a REMAND to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.” See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).

SIGNED _March 12 _, 2020

STEPHAN M. VIDMAR United States Magistrate Judge

Submitted by: Counsel for Defendant: John C. Anderson United States Attorney /s/Allan D. Berger (electronically submitted March 11, 2020) ALLAN D. BERGER Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Ste. 4169 Denver, CO 80294-4003 Telephone: (303) 844-2149 Allan. berger@ssa.gov

> The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 58.

Counsel for Plaintiff:

/s/Katherine H. O’Neal (signature provided by counsel for the Commissioner with consent to file as unopposed provided on March 3, 2020) Katherine H. O’Neal Michael D. Armstrong Law Offices, LLC Attorney for Plaintiff 220 Adams St. SE, Suite B Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108 Telephone: (505) 890-9056 FAX: (505) 266-5860 kate.oneal01@michaelarmstronglaw.com

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Carrillo v. Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrillo-v-social-security-administration-nmd-2020.