Carrillo v. Sessions
This text of 687 F. App'x 610 (Carrillo v. Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Juan Rafael Carrillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny the petition for review.
[611]*611We decline Carrillo s request to remand to the BIA in light of Matter of Avetisyan, 25 I. & N. Dec. 688 (BIA 2012), and EOIR’s subsequent policy memorandum, because Carrillo did not request administrative closure from the BIA.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
687 F. App'x 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrillo-v-sessions-ca9-2017.