Carrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

775 So. 2d 430, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 261, 2001 WL 37726

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 17, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-2610

StatusPublished

This text of 775 So. 2d 430 (Carrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrillo v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 775 So. 2d 430, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 261, 2001 WL 37726 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Lissette V. Carrillo, appeals from the denial of unemployment benefits. We affirm.

The claimant has failed to successfully challenge the findings of fact that were made by the appeals referee because she cannot demonstrate that the findings are not supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Ford v. Southeast Atl. Corp., 588 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Based on the findings made by the appeals referee, the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s conclusion that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with work must be affirmed. See Tallahassee Housing Auth. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 483 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986); Martinson v. Breit’s Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The claimant, Lissette V. Carrillo, appeals from the denial of unemployment benefits. We affirm.

The claimant has failed to successfully challenge the findings of fact that were made by the appeals referee because she cannot demonstrate that the findings are not supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Ford v. Southeast Atl. Corp., 588 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). Based on the findings made by the appeals referee, the Unemployment Appeals Commission’s conclusion that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with work must be affirmed. See Tallahassee Housing Auth. v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 483 So.2d 413 (Fla.1986); Martinson v. Breit’s Tower Serv., Inc., 680 So.2d 599 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

775 So. 2d 430, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 261, 2001 WL 37726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrillo-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack