Carrillo v. DeSanto
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-21110 Conference Calendar
GERRARDO CARRILLO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
J.A. DESANTO, Houston Police Department; CLARENCE BRADFORD, Police Chief; CITY OF HOUSTON; DAVID C. ZAHARIS; JOHN A. JACKSON,
Defendants-Appellees.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CV-4023 -------------------- August 21, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Gerrardo Carrillo moves for leave to proceed in forma
pauperis (“IFP”) to appeal the district court’s denial of his
motion for a three-judge panel and the lack of a neutral judge.
See FED. R. APP. P. 24(a)(5). Because Carrillo has not shown that
he will present a nonfrivolous issue, his motion to proceed IFP
is DENIED. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir.
1982) (movant must show that he is a pauper and that he will
present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal). In addition, the
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-21110 -2-
instant appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous;
accordingly, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
MOTION TO PROCEED IFP DENIED; ALL OTHER PENDING MOTIONS
DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carrillo v. DeSanto (Carrillo v. DeSanto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.