Carrillo v. Craven

392 U.S. 644, 88 S. Ct. 2298, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1354, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1152
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 17, 1968·No. No. 1201·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Peyton v. Rowe, 391 U. S. 54.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrillo v. Craven, 392 U.S. 644, 88 S. Ct. 2298, 20 L. Ed. 2d 1354, 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1152 (1968).

392 U.S. 644 (Carrillo v. Craven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Fosnight
679 P.2d 174 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1984)
United States ex rel. Williams v. Walker
535 F.2d 383 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Walker
535 F.2d 383 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
Bradshaw v. State of Oklahoma
398 F. Supp. 838 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1975)
Isbell v. State
304 So. 2d 904 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Culbert v. State
290 So. 2d 235 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1974)
Boswell v. State
282 So. 2d 337 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1973)
Echols v. State
249 So. 2d 639 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Shiflett v. Virginia
433 F.2d 124 (Fourth Circuit, 1970)
State v. Henderson
468 P.2d 136 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1970)
Gore v. State
227 So. 2d 432 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1969)
Callahan v. State
215 So. 2d 887 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Wilbanks v. State
266 So. 2d 609 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)