Carrillo Development, LLC v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
This text of 193 So. 3d 4 (Carrillo Development, LLC v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cabrillo Development, LLC and James and Tudor Austin appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (“Bayview”), following a nonjury trial. Appellants assert, inter alia, that Bayview lacked standing to foreclose on the property at issue and that Bayview was not a holder in due course.
We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, concluding that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determinations that Bayview had standing, and that Bayview was a holder in due course as provided in section 673.3021(1), Florida Statutes (2010). See § 673.3051, Fla. Stat. (2010); Bank of Miami v. Fla. City Express, Inc., 367 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Barclays Bank P.L.C. v. Conkey, 695 So.2d 931 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 So. 3d 4, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19222, 2015 WL 9315732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrillo-development-llc-v-bayview-loan-servicing-llc-fladistctapp-2015.