Carrillo Development, LLC v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC

193 So. 3d 4, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19222, 2015 WL 9315732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 23, 2015·No. No. 3D15-328·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cabrillo Development, LLC and James and Tudor Austin appeal a final judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (“Bayview”), following a nonjury trial. Appellants assert, inter alia, that Bayview lacked standing to foreclose on the property at issue and that Bayview was not a holder in due course.

We affirm the final judgment of foreclosure, concluding that there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s determinations that Bayview had standing, and that Bayview was a holder in due course as provided in section 673.3021(1), Florida Statutes (2010). See § 673.3051, Fla. Stat. (2010); Bank of Miami v. Fla. City Express, Inc., 367 So.2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Barclays Bank P.L.C. v. Conkey, 695 So.2d 931 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrillo Development, LLC v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, 193 So. 3d 4, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19222, 2015 WL 9315732 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

193 So. 3d 4 (Carrillo Development, LLC v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Miami v. Florida City Express, Inc.
367 So. 2d 683 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Barclays Bank, P.L.C. v. Conkey
695 So. 2d 931 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)