Carrigan v. Alverson Taylor Mortensen & Sanders

291 F. App'x 48

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Debra Carrigan appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing her case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This court reviews the district court’s order de novo, and we affirm. See Love v. United States, 915 F.2d 1242 (9th Cir. 1990); Gibson v. United States, 781 F.2d 1334,1337 (9th Cir.1986).

Our review of the record and of appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.