Carriero v. Iovino

281 A.D. 1052, 121 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 13, 1953·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— -Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Saratoga Special Term, which denied a motion to dismiss the complaint herein, under rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, on the ground the court had no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action. The complaint is laid in negligence arising out of an automobile accident. Defendant’s contention on the motion was that both parties were employees of the General Electric Company, engaged in the course of their employment at the time the accident happened, and that plaintiff’s sole remedy was under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The Special Term held that an issue of fact was presented as to whether plaintiff was acting within the scope of his employment at the time the accident occurred. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs. Present — • Foster, P. J., Brewster, Coon, Halpern and Imrie. JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carriero v. Iovino, 281 A.D. 1052, 121 N.Y.S.2d 127, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4302 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

281 A.D. 1052 (Carriero v. Iovino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morris v. Luck
28 Misc. 2d 831 (New York Supreme Court, 1961)
Laskoski v. De Mers
10 A.D.2d 896 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)