Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck
688 A.2d 334, 240 Conn. 907, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 52
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 4, 1997
DocketSC 15610
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 688 A.2d 334 (Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck, 688 A.2d 334, 240 Conn. 907, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 52 (Colo. 1997).
Opinion
The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 773 (AC 14862), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the provisions of General Statutes § 7-433b (b) did not apply to the plaintiff’s pension benefits?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck
707 A.2d 706 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
688 A.2d 334, 240 Conn. 907, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carriero-v-borough-of-naugatuck-conn-1997.