Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck

688 A.2d 334, 240 Conn. 907, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 52
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 4, 1997·No. SC 15610·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The named defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 43 Conn. App. 773 (AC 14862), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the provisions of General Statutes § 7-433b (b) did not apply to the plaintiff’s pension benefits?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck, 688 A.2d 334, 240 Conn. 907, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 52 (Colo. 1997).

688 A.2d 334 (Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carriero v. Borough of Naugatuck
707 A.2d 706 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)