Carriere v. Potter

Eighth Circuit

Carriere v. Potter

83 F. App'x 139

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1196, 03-1198

StatusPublished

This text of 83 F. App'x 139 (Carriere v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carriere v. Potter, 83 F. App'x 139 (8th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, postal workers James S. Garriere and Randy J. Devitt appeal the district court’s¹ adverse [140]*140grant of summary judgment in their employment-related actions against the postmaster general and their union. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jensen v. Henderson, 315 F.3d 854, 857 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, postal workers James S. Garriere and Randy J. Devitt appeal the district court’s¹ adverse [140]*140grant of summary judgment in their employment-related actions against the postmaster general and their union. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Jensen v. Henderson, 315 F.3d 854, 857 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 F. App'x 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carriere-v-potter-ca8-2003.