Carrier v. Carrier

1 How. N.P. 146

Opinion

By the Court,

Jennison, J.:

This case has been pending for four years.

' Complainant’s counsel asks for her a decree of divorce, and asserts that she is in New York, and cannot conveniently get here.

If she doesn’t think it worth while to come to Detroit, I am not willing to grant her a divorce.

Complainants should appear and be sworn, and give their testimony in open court, as an evidence of their good faith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Jennison, J.:

This case has been pending for four years.

' Complainant’s counsel asks for her a decree of divorce, and asserts that she is in New York, and cannot conveniently get here.

If she doesn’t think it worth while to come to Detroit, I am not willing to grant her a divorce.

Complainants should appear and be sworn, and give their testimony in open court, as an evidence of their good faith.

Carrier v. Carrier, 1 How. N.P. 146 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1883).

Pincite

1 How. N.P. 146 (Carrier v. Carrier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.