Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 25, 2021·No. 13-21-00022-CV·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00022-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

CARRIE M. LEO, Appellant, v.

TYLER C. THOMAS AND NICHOLAS STACEY, Appellees.

On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

This matter is before the Court on appellant’s notice of withdrawal of plaintiff’s notice of appeal. The Court construes this notice as a motion to dismiss.

The Court, having considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Therefore, appellant’s motion

to dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Delivered and filed on the 25th day of February, 2021.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey, (Tex. Ct. App. 2021).

Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey (Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.