Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey
Opinion
NUMBER 13-21-00022-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
CARRIE M. LEO, Appellant, v.
TYLER C. THOMAS AND NICHOLAS STACEY, Appellees.
On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s notice of withdrawal of plaintiff’s notice of appeal. The Court construes this notice as a motion to dismiss.
The Court, having considered appellant’s unopposed motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Therefore, appellant’s motion
to dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").
JAIME TIJERINA
Justice
Delivered and filed on the 25th day of February, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey (Carrie M. Leo v. Tyler C. Thomas and Nicholas Stacey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.