CARRIE BOATWRIGHT v. Mark Brannan

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2016·No. 14-5905·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

CARRIE BOATWRIGHT, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D14-5905

MARK BRANNAN,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed June 28, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County. Stanley H. Griffis III, Judge.

Claire Cubbin, for Appellant.

Lorraine H. Sherman, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Aills v. Boemi, 29 So. 3d 1105, 1109 (Fla. 2010)

(“Appellate review is . . . limited to the specific grounds for objection raised at

trial.”); Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp., 144 So. 3d 557, 560 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)

(holding that an appellate court cannot reverse an “unpreserved claim of error absent

fundamental error”).

LEWIS, B.L. THOMAS and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CARRIE BOATWRIGHT v. Mark Brannan, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

CARRIE BOATWRIGHT v. Mark Brannan (CARRIE BOATWRIGHT v. Mark Brannan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aills v. Boemi
29 So. 3d 1105 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
Yau v. IWDWarriors, Corp.
144 So. 3d 557 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)