Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain
This text of 13 F. App'x 79 (Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dean Russell Carrico appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain, No. CA-99-168-1 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
13 F. App'x 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrico-v-village-of-sugar-mountain-ca4-2001.