Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain

13 F. App'x 79
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2001·No. No. 00-1842·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dean Russell Carrico appeals the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain, No. CA-99-168-1 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain, 13 F. App'x 79 (4th Cir. 2001).

13 F. App'x 79 (Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terry v. Sparrow
328 B.R. 442 (M.D. North Carolina, 2005)