Carrick v. Westcott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carrick v. Westcott

249 A.D. 760, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 249 A.D. 760 (Carrick v. Westcott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrick v. Westcott, 249 A.D. 760, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to foreclose a purchase-money second mortgage on certain premises situate in the town of Mamaroneek. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and the impleaded defendant, Esther L. Carrick, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The 86th finding of fact is amended so as to provide that the memorandum signed on or about June 9, 1930, prior to the execution and delivery of the formal contract of purchase and sale, was signed by Esther L. Carrick personally as owner. It appears from the memorandum that Boehm & Co., by Emil Zvirin, signed as broker and not on behalf of defendant Esther L. Carrick. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to foreclose a purchase-money second mortgage on certain premises situate in the town of Mamaroneek. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and the impleaded defendant, Esther L. Carrick, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The 86th finding of fact is amended so as to provide that the memorandum signed on or about June 9, 1930, prior to the execution and delivery of the formal contract of purchase and sale, was signed by Esther L. Carrick personally as owner. It appears from the memorandum that Boehm & Co., by Emil Zvirin, signed as broker and not on behalf of defendant Esther L. Carrick. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D. 760, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrick-v-westcott-nyappdiv-1936.