Carrick v. Westcott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carrick v. Westcott

249 A.D. 760, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1936·Published

Opinion

Action to foreclose a purchase-money second mortgage on certain premises situate in the town of Mamaroneek. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and the impleaded defendant, Esther L. Carrick, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The 86th finding of fact is amended so as to provide that the memorandum signed on or about June 9, 1930, prior to the execution and delivery of the formal contract of purchase and sale, was signed by Esther L. Carrick personally as owner. It appears from the memorandum that Boehm & Co., by Emil Zvirin, signed as broker and not on behalf of defendant Esther L. Carrick. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to foreclose a purchase-money second mortgage on certain premises situate in the town of Mamaroneek. Judgment in favor of plaintiff and the impleaded defendant, Esther L. Carrick, unanimously affirmed, with costs. The 86th finding of fact is amended so as to provide that the memorandum signed on or about June 9, 1930, prior to the execution and delivery of the formal contract of purchase and sale, was signed by Esther L. Carrick personally as owner. It appears from the memorandum that Boehm & Co., by Emil Zvirin, signed as broker and not on behalf of defendant Esther L. Carrick. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Johnston and Taylor, JJ.

Carrick v. Westcott, 249 A.D. 760, 292 N.Y.S. 1004, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

249 A.D. 760 (Carrick v. Westcott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.