Carrick v. Plusquellic

777 N.E.2d 268, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1411
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 23, 2002
Docket2002-1176
StatusPublished

This text of 777 N.E.2d 268 (Carrick v. Plusquellic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carrick v. Plusquellic, 777 N.E.2d 268, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1411 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

In Quo Warranto. On motion to strike motion for reconsideration and motion to vacate order. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would deny as moot. Pfeifer, J., would dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
777 N.E.2d 268, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrick-v-plusquellic-ohio-2002.