Carrew v. Willing

Supreme Court

Carrew v. Willing

1 U.S. 130, 1 Dall. 130

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 1, 1785

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 U.S. 130 (Carrew v. Willing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrew v. Willing, 1 U.S. 130, 1 Dall. 130 (1785).

Pincite

Opinion

CAPIAS to June, 1784. The Bail bond sued to September, 1784; and December 1784, judgment was signed on the bail bond suit, nisi special bail filed in 30 days. Default was made in filing special bail, and a fi: fa: issued to June 1785.

*131 On the 13th of August, Sergeant, for the plaintiff, shewed cause; but, after argument, the rule was made absolute.

And now, August 8, 1785, Sitgreaves filed defendant’s affidavit of a just defence, and obtained a rule to shew cause, why the proceedings in the bail bond suit should not be stayed on paying costs, pleading issuable in the original action, taking short notice of trial, and consenting that the judgment on the bail bond should stand as a security. He cited Barnes’s notes 74. Birch vs Graves, Ib. 85. Otway vs Cockayne, Ibid. 91. Seaber vs Powell. Ibid 112. Mortey vs Carr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAPIAS to June, 1784. The Bail bond sued to September, 1784; and December 1784, judgment was signed on the bail bond suit, nisi special bail filed in 30 days. Default was made in filing special bail, and a fi: fa: issued to June 1785.

*131 On the 13th of August, Sergeant, for the plaintiff, shewed cause; but, after argument, the rule was made absolute.

And now, August 8, 1785, Sitgreaves filed defendant’s affidavit of a just defence, and obtained a rule to shew cause, why the proceedings in the bail bond suit should not be stayed on paying costs, pleading issuable in the original action, taking short notice of trial, and consenting that the judgment on the bail bond should stand as a security. He cited Barnes’s notes 74. Birch vs Graves, Ib. 85. Otway vs Cockayne, Ibid. 91. Seaber vs Powell. Ibid 112. Mortey vs Carr.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 U.S. 130, 1 Dall. 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrew-v-willing-scotus-1785.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack