Carrero v. Carrero
This text of 493 So. 2d 547 (Carrero v. Carrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no abuse of discretion in a trial judge failing to require a residential or custodial parent to reside in the State of Florida when the residential parent and the minor children had, prior to the entry of the final judgment, moved to a foreign state where the residential parent had relatives, there being no court order requiring said parent to remain in the state pending the litigation and the noncustodial parent agreeing that the residential parent was the proper person to have custody of the children. See and compare Matilla v. Matilla, 474 So.2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
493 So. 2d 547, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 1929, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrero-v-carrero-fladistctapp-1986.