Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.

201 A.D.2d 693, 609 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1690
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 28, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.) dated March 20, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is found in the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The record presents no triable issues of fact with regard to the plaintiff’s status as a special employee of the defendant (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553; Cameli v Pace Univ., 131 AD2d 419). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc., 201 A.D.2d 693, 609 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 693 (Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Causewell v. Barnes & Noble Bookstores, Inc.
238 A.D.2d 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Reyes v. Tamarack Resort, Inc.
215 A.D.2d 468 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Garner v. Two Exchange Plaza Partners
215 A.D.2d 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Schulze v. Associated Universities
212 A.D.2d 588 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Levine v. Pontiac
203 A.D.2d 259 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)