Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.

201 A.D.2d 693, 609 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1690

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 693 (Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carreras v. Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc., 201 A.D.2d 693, 609 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.) dated March 20, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is found in the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The record presents no triable issues of fact with regard to the plaintiff’s status as a special employee of the defendant (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553; Cameli v Pace Univ., 131 AD2d 419). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.) dated March 20, 1992, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy is found in the Workers’ Compensation Law.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The record presents no triable issues of fact with regard to the plaintiff’s status as a special employee of the defendant (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Thompson v Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 NY2d 553; Cameli v Pace Univ., 131 AD2d 419). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 693, 609 N.Y.S.2d 840, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carreras-v-lawrence-aviation-industries-inc-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack