Carrazana v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Carrazana v. State

816 So. 2d 804, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583, 2002 WL 985353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 15, 2002

DocketNo. 3D01-2477

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 804 (Carrazana v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carrazana v. State, 816 So. 2d 804, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583, 2002 WL 985353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 804, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583, 2002 WL 985353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrazana-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack