Carrazana v. State
816 So. 2d 804, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583, 2002 WL 985353
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 2002·No. No. 3D01-2477·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The state concedes that the judgment adjudicating defendant guilty of direct criminal contempt and sentence of incarceration failed to include a recital of the facts upon which the adjudication of guilt was based, as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.830. Accordingly, the convictions and sentences are vacated and the cause is remanded for the trial court, if it wishes, to conduct further proceedings in accordance with the rule. See Alvis v. State, 764 So.2d 859 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Carrazana v. State, 816 So. 2d 804, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6583, 2002 WL 985353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
816 So. 2d 804 (Carrazana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cifuentes v. State
816 So. 2d 804 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)