Carraway v. Common

677 So. 2d 51, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7053, 1996 WL 382297
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 10, 1996
DocketNo. 95-04823
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 677 So. 2d 51 (Carraway v. Common) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carraway v. Common, 677 So. 2d 51, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7053, 1996 WL 382297 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

In this appeal from a nonfinal order determining liability, the Carraways challenge the entry of a default judgment against them. We reverse.

On December 23, 1994, the Commons sued the Carraways in a multi-count complaint seeking recovery on a promissory note and damages for a fraudulent transfer. The Carraways, through counsel, filed an answer and affirmative defenses. On August 14, 1995, the Carraways’ counsel moved to withdraw. On October 9, 1995, the trial court granted the motion and included in the order that “the Carraways shall have 20 days from the date of this order to obtain counsel.”

On November 3, 1995, counsel for the Commons forwarded to the trial judge a proposed order granting a default judgment on the grounds that the court file did not reflect that the Carraways had obtained new counsel or filed any pleadings. There was no motion for entry of a default judgment or any notice given to the Carraways as required by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). The trial court entered the proposed order. At the time the trial court entered the default, the case was at issue and the Carraways were not required to file any further pleadings. No attempt was made to strike their answer for noncompliance with a court order, nor was there any basis to do so. Individuals are not required to be represented by counsel. The entry of default judgment was clear error and the order of the trial court is reversed. See Camerota v. Kaufman, 666 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ARTHUR J. MORRISON v. Z ROOFING & WATERPROOFING, INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2022

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 So. 2d 51, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7053, 1996 WL 382297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carraway-v-common-fladistctapp-1996.