Carrasco v. United States

618 F.2d 119, 219 Ct. Cl. 717, 215 Ct. Cl. 19, 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 12
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Carrasco v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 215 Ct. Cl. 19
United States Court of Claims·Decided January 19, 1979·No. No. 190-76·Published

Opinion

On January 19, 1979 the court entered judgment for plaintiffs as follows:

For Eugene A. Caso, the sum of $16,322.40 with $99.21 to be credited as premiums on Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance, $1,142.55 to Civil Service Retirement Fund, and $15,080.64 paid to plaintiff.

For Albert E. Gonzales, the sum of $2,709.48 with $6.44 to be credited as premiums on Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance, $91.08 to Civil Service Retirement Fund and $2,611.96 to plaintiff.

For Mike A. Luga, the sum of $1,150.40 with $11.78 to be credited as premiums on Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance, $80.64 to Civil Service Retirement Fund and $1,057.98 paid to plaintiff.

For Harry L. Mangerich, the sum of $7,415.60 with $14.35 to be credited as premiums on Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance, $149.66 to Civil Service Retirement Fund and $7,251.59 to plaintiff.

The court further ordered that pursuant to prior action of the court the petition be dismissed as to plaintiffs [718] Octavio Carrasco, Jr., George S. Martin, Jr., and Jimmie R. Osburn, respectively.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carrasco v. United States, 618 F.2d 119, 219 Ct. Cl. 717, 215 Ct. Cl. 19, 1979 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 12 (cc 1979).

618 F.2d 119 (Carrasco v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.