Carrasco v. Marcus

62 P.2d 1405, 18 Cal. App. 2d 96, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 166
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 10, 1936
DocketCiv. No. 1674
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 62 P.2d 1405 (Carrasco v. Marcus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Carrasco v. Marcus, 62 P.2d 1405, 18 Cal. App. 2d 96, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 166 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

MARKS, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the appeal

from a judgment of the Superior Court of Inyo County under the provisions of rule V, of the Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal.

The certificate of the county clerk of Inyo County shows that judgment was rendered and entered on October 4, 1935, and that notice of appeal to the District Court of Appeal, Second District, was filed on December 30, 1935. Because of jurisdiction the case was transferred to the Supreme Court and by that court transferred here.

Neither transcript nor briefs have been filed and no appearance has been made' by appellants although the legal time within which to do so has long since expired.

The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Wright
110 P.2d 88 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 P.2d 1405, 18 Cal. App. 2d 96, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carrasco-v-marcus-calctapp-1936.